Crighton CR700W

The news and your views about biking
User avatar
Stonesie
Posts: 2361
Joined: 11 Jun 2014, 21:43
Your Bike: BMW R1250GSA
Has thanked: 1388 times
Been thanked: 1465 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Stonesie »

Iirc my SuperDuke GT was quoted as 106lb:ft and at least 100kg heavier, it was no slouch.

I can't imagine what this thing will be like to ride, somewhere between insanity and wonderful madness?
User avatar
Perkles
Posts: 5889
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 21:51
Your Bike:
Location: birminghamshire
Has thanked: 2152 times
Been thanked: 1465 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Perkles »

It’s a rotary it will fall to bits
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 7955
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1044 times
Been thanked: 2205 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Cav »

It's the curve more specifically. It will ride like a supercharged 600 would, not like a torque monster such as the 1290R KTM.

You aren't going to be at 5000 rpm, twist the throttle and have the bike catapult you down the road, you'll need to be at 12 for that to happen. It SHOULD have the most easy to use curves on the market.
User avatar
Monty
Posts: 6707
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 07:59
Your Bike: KTM 690 SMC R
Location: Peak District
Has thanked: 2116 times
Been thanked: 2440 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Monty »

It would be totally wasted on me, there's no way I could ride that thing, amazing as it is. It's a proper race bike for actual racers.
Monty™© MCMLXXII
User avatar
StMarks
Posts: 4587
Joined: 17 Mar 2014, 21:55
Your Bike: Daytona 675 graphite
Location: East Riding of Yorkshire
Has thanked: 920 times
Been thanked: 1314 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by StMarks »

Interesting that they have chosen a single rear shock, mounted in the ( largely abandoned ) traditional location.
I imagine the savings realised from that simple approach may have contributed to the very low weight.?
User avatar
Jack
Posts: 2629
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 21:49
Your Bike:
Has thanked: 1396 times
Been thanked: 1636 times
Contact:

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Jack »

StMarks wrote:Interesting that they have chosen a single rear shock, mounted in the ( largely abandoned ) traditional location.
I imagine the savings realised from that simple approach may have contributed to the very low weight.?
I think they had to do that as the silencer for the exhaust is where it would be if it were mounted in the centre .
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 7955
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1044 times
Been thanked: 2205 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Cav »

I think you could both be right. Lightweight bikes require less complex suspension systems now suspension technology is so advanced and it also meant they could route it how they do.
User avatar
Perkles
Posts: 5889
Joined: 11 Mar 2014, 21:51
Your Bike:
Location: birminghamshire
Has thanked: 2152 times
Been thanked: 1465 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Perkles »

Cav wrote:It's the curve more specifically. It will ride like a supercharged 600 would, not like a torque monster such as the 1290R KTM.

You aren't going to be at 5000 rpm, twist the throttle and have the bike catapult you down the road, you'll need to be at 12 for that to happen. It SHOULD have the most easy to use curves on the market.
I dont think it will ride anything like a supercharged bike, I have driven a few highly tuned rotary engine cars and they make all of the power at high revs then explode in a pile of bits
I have a tuned R53 with a geared down supercharger and it makes all its power low down, such a perfect B road car
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 7955
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1044 times
Been thanked: 2205 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Cav »

To be more specific I'm talking about a root supercharger where, from a few hundred revs above idle, it acts as a multiplier on the preexisting power and torque therefore increasing gradient but otherwise leaving the curves alone. None of this Kawasaki "centrifugal supercharger / turbo halfway house" nonsense which only really adds power to the top.
Bob T
Posts: 71
Joined: 15 Nov 2020, 15:09
Your Bike: 2021 BMW R1250RS, 2017 Ducati 939 Supersport, 1967 Ducati 250 Mk3, 2021 BMW S1000XR (hers)
Has thanked: 18 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Bob T »

Jack wrote:
Cav wrote:With a good throttle map, surely it'd be really nice to ride? low torque, linear power and probably a really nicely balanced chassis. You don't have to pin it :)
Is 105 lb - ft low torque ? From a 690cc motor ?
The Ducati V4S is only 91 lb - ft from 1000cc

fwiw I think it'd be a real beast to ride but enormous fun and very satisfying when you got things right but very painful and expensive if you got things wrong .
True, but it is not 690cc in the conventional way of thinking. Very hard to compare the volume of a Wankel engine with a traditional four stroke engine.
User avatar
Cav
Posts: 7955
Joined: 27 Oct 2015, 12:00
Your Bike: 2009 ZX6R
Has thanked: 1044 times
Been thanked: 2205 times

Re: Crighton CR700W

Post by Cav »

I hadn't even thought about that. It's often a 1/3rd the equivalent volume of an ICE engine if the marketing blurb from a couple decades ago can be believed.
Post Reply