520 Chain Conversion

The news and your views about biking
Post Reply
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

520 Chain Conversion

Post by Blade »

Anybody done this mod ?

Need to replace the chain and sprockets on the sp2 so was considering going for a 520 conversion.

Anyone got any feedback ?
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38612
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4327 times
Been thanked: 8367 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Kwacky »

Personally I've never seen the point for a road bike. I've asked in the past when I've been changing move but on both occasions I've been told it's not worth it unless I'm going to be swapping sprocket sizes around - there's supposed to be more choice in 520
User avatar
Deegee
Posts: 4206
Joined: 02 Apr 2014, 11:20
Your Bike: Daytona 675 & Tiger 900
Location: Côte d'Essex
Has thanked: 1046 times
Been thanked: 967 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Deegee »

I did it to my track 675, but tbh I couldn't tell the difference, theoretically you get lighter unsprung weight and less power absorption by the chain, but it's only going to be noticeable on a stopwatch or by an "Alien" imho.

From what I've seen it's only really worth it if you do the 520 conversion as part of a raft of improvements to get a usable increase in performance, otherwise you're paying a lot of money for a chain and sprockets that'll stretch and wear (especially on a big V twin) and will be knackered faster than a decent aftermarket item.
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Blade »

Cheers Kwacky.

Yes most of the weight saving benefit is in the alloy sprockets tbh. The chain is about 400 grams lighter but as unsprung mass it's similar to loosing 2.5 kg of the sprung mass of the bike.

I know it sounds of little benefit but I have reduced the bikes weight by 20 kg and a lot of that was from numerous small savings as after a few big weight savings you have to start looking for the little losses.
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Blade »

Deegee wrote:I did it to my track 675, but tbh I couldn't tell the difference, theoretically you get lighter unsprung weight and less power absorption by the chain, but it's only going to be noticeable on a stopwatch or by an "Alien" imho.

From what I've seen it's only really worth it if you do the 520 conversion as part of a raft of improvements to get a usable increase in performance, otherwise you're paying a lot of money for a chain and sprockets that'll stretch and wear (especially on a big V twin) and will be knackered faster than a decent aftermarket item.
The race spec 520 chain Im looking at has the same tensile strength as the recommended road 530 chain so it won't wear any quicker.

Plus it will still be even better than the oem chain specification and I only do about 600 miles a year on the SP so the chain will be good for 20 years whatever I get.
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Blade »

An Afam -8 520 chain (highest spec) has exactly the same tensile strength as the -7 530 chain.

Can't remember the units but there both 4180 tensile strength.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38612
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4327 times
Been thanked: 8367 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Kwacky »

As part of an overall weight saving exercise and on a well maintained and low usage road motorbike I can't see why you wouldn't do it IMO
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Blade »

Cheers Kwacky.

Yes most of the weight saving benefit is in the alloy sprockets tbh. The chain is about 400 grams lighter but as unsprung mass it's similar to loosing 2.5 kg of the spring mass of the bike.

I know it sounds of little benefit but I have reduced the bikes weight by 20 kg and a lot of that was from numerous small savings as after a few big weight savings you have to start looking for the little losses.
User avatar
Monty
Posts: 6711
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 07:59
Your Bike: KTM 690 SMC R
Location: Peak District
Has thanked: 2118 times
Been thanked: 2443 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Monty »

The only difference I noticed was the sprocket wore out much much quicker, but at 600 miles a year that's never going to be a problem.

Personally I will never put an alloy sprocket on a road bike again but only because of the mileage.
Monty™© MCMLXXII
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38612
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4327 times
Been thanked: 8367 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Kwacky »

Blade, didn't those tests show that the tensile strength was the same but the 525 was able to withstand the test for longer?

Afam is quality kit. I get excellent mileage from mine.

I think 520 on the SP2 makes sense if you're looking at an overall weight loss plan.
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Blade »

I don't know Kwacky. I got the figures from the afam catalogue. I assume the testing is to a defined standard to allow comparison otherwise it is meaningless imo.

@Monty. Did you use a hard anodised alloy sprocket as I got 12000 mile out of one on the Blade and it still had life remaining.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38612
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4327 times
Been thanked: 8367 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Kwacky »

I got well over 10,000 on my last set of Afam chain and sprockets and that's with winter riding. The front had started to hook out.

Blade, it's effectively a yank test to simulate the loading and unloading on a chain.
User avatar
Monty
Posts: 6711
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 07:59
Your Bike: KTM 690 SMC R
Location: Peak District
Has thanked: 2118 times
Been thanked: 2443 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Monty »

Mine where Afam and I didn't get any chain stretch and yes hard anodised.

Felt like riding a wizards sleeve after a few thousand miles
Monty™© MCMLXXII
User avatar
Blade
Posts: 18772
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 18:43
Your Bike: Kawasaki ZX10R
Location: North West
Has thanked: 3134 times
Been thanked: 3767 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Blade »

Kwacky wrote:I got well over 10,000 on my last set of Afam chain and sprockets and that's with winter riding. The front had started to hook out.

Blade, it's effectively a yank test to simulate the loading and unloading on a chain.
Yes I know what a tensile test is but you implied there was a difference in time. That I don't know, the catalogue just gives a tensile strength nothing is mentioned about duration of test or too what standard it was performed.

Do yiu have more informaion ? Or a link to where you found this info it sounds very interesting
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38612
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4327 times
Been thanked: 8367 times

Re: 520 Chain Conversion

Post by Kwacky »

I'll look it up when I get home.
Post Reply