Question for Kwacky

The news and your views about biking
Post Reply
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15493
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4170 times
Been thanked: 4124 times

Question for Kwacky

Post by duke63 »

If a rider has an accident wearing shorts, trainers, vest and no gloves and has a serious life changing accident, much of it down to him not wearing any safety gear, would the insurance company view he has contributed to those injuries by not wearing safety gear and try to reduce the payout as a result?
User avatar
StMarks
Posts: 4578
Joined: 17 Mar 2014, 21:55
Your Bike: Daytona 675 graphite
Location: East Riding of Yorkshire
Has thanked: 915 times
Been thanked: 1306 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by StMarks »

Interesting question mate.
As it happens I saw a lad on a 1k bike just today in shorts, T-shirt. trainers & no gloves. :^
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38538
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4314 times
Been thanked: 8352 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by Kwacky »

No.

The only reductions we can seek are for a lack of a helmet or not securing the helmet correctly.

There's no legal requirement to wear protective gear.
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15493
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4170 times
Been thanked: 4124 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by duke63 »

I was reading that William Dunlop's helmet came off in his fatal crash.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38538
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4314 times
Been thanked: 8352 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by Kwacky »

It is possible for a correctly fitted helmet to come off
User avatar
C00kiemonster
Posts: 8425
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:11
Your Bike: Triumph Street Triple 765 R
Location: Not Froggie Land
Has thanked: 4296 times
Been thanked: 1737 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by C00kiemonster »

Kwacky wrote:No.

The only reductions we can seek are for a lack of a helmet or not securing the helmet correctly.

There's no legal requirement to wear protective gear.
Interestingly France has a problem with people not wearing gloves so they have made that a legal requirement too as well as a lid.
bud
Posts: 28
Joined: 18 Jul 2018, 21:57
Your Bike: Honda Hornet, Honda CBF250, Yamaha Slider
Has thanked: 14 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by bud »

Kwacky wrote:It is possible for a correctly fitted helmet to come off
I remember that horrible crash that killed Marco Simoncelli. No fault was ever found with the helmet, even though it came off.
User avatar
D41
Posts: 12923
Joined: 22 Sep 2014, 11:36
Your Bike: Triumph Daytona 650.
Has thanked: 4283 times
Been thanked: 1129 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by D41 »

I seem to remember reading that Simo wore a helmet that was a touch larger than ideal just to accommodate all his hair.
That said, there was nothing about that wreck that was going to end well for him.....massive head, neck & chest injuries. The inertial forces of the two bikes that hit him were massive.
User avatar
T.C.
Posts: 406
Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 12:08
Your Bike: Blackbird
Location: Reading, Berks
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 250 times
Contact:

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by T.C. »

This is the area of law I work in.

Firstly, there are no deductions for contributory negligence if a rider comes off wearing nothing more than shorts and a T shirt.

The Hight court deemed a long time ago that someone should not pay the penalty for not wearing proper kit on the grounds that had it not been for the negligence of the defendant then the crash and therefpre the injuries probably would nothave occured in the first place.

However, if a claimant was not wearing a helmet or it was not securely fastened, then the claimant might be hit up to a maximum of 25% of their compensation, but the defence have to satisfy the requirement that not wearing a helmet or the insecurity contributed to the injuries sustained.

So for example, a rider has a crash caused by someone else. Said rider was not wearing a helmet and sustains lower leg injuries. No head injury, so whilst the rider may be convicted of riding without protective headgear, there would be no contributory negligence.

This piece I wrote for our website may make things clearer in regards of contrib.

https://www.hudgellsolicitors.co.uk/new ... rcyclists/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

As far as good fitting helmets coming off? Oh yes.

I was the expert in the case of Finnis v Cauldfielfd in 2001. Finnis https://lexisweb.co.uk/cases/2002/octob ... s-car-hire" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The motorcycle (Kawasaki ZX7R) ridden by Kevin Finnis hit a car turning right across his path car on the passenger side causing the rider to be thrown from his bike.

The force of the impact was so great, Mr Finnis was catapulted over the roof of the defendant Citroen during which time his crash helmet became detached from his head and came off, leaving his head exposed. He landed on the road on the opposite side of the car closely followed by his bike which landed on his unprotected head causing extensive injuries, not least of which was an injury to his brain.

The defence admitted causation in so much that they admitted that their client caused the crash by turning right across the path of Mr Finnis, but claimed that his head injuries were self inflicted as a result of his crash helmet either not being securely fastened, being a bad fit, in poor condition or a combination of the 3.

Unfortunately, although the Police had retained the client’s crash helmet at the time of the crash, when the property was returned to his wife some 6 months later, she disposed of it and it was therefore no longer available for inspection.

The Police were able to confirm that when they found the crash helmet at the scene, the fastening strap was still done up and the retaining bolts were still attached to the helmet.

The investigation (carried out by me) revealed that the claimant had not long returned to riding motorcycles and had subsequently purchased all new protective riding equipment about 3 months before.

The retailer who sold the client his crash helmet was interviewed and was able to confirm that apart from being a new helmet, it had also been a good fit and a number of different styles and models had been tried on until the best fit could be found. Witnesses were also able to confirm that the helmet was a good fit.

The brand of helmet worn by Mr Finnis was manufactured and approved at the highest level of British Standards, and so the possibility of there being a defect was discounted given how new it was.

I made contact with the head of neuro surgery at the time based at The JR2 in Oxford who had done a number of case studies on helmets coming off and he revealed that it was not unknown for a crash helmet to become detached in a heavy collision situation and they in fact had 3 recorded cases on file themselves.

In one case 2 racing motorcyclists were thrown from their machines, and television footage showed both helmets clearly coming off the riders heads. In another a young 18 year old girl was involved in a collision with an oncoming vehicle and her helmet was seen to come off her head before impact. Her helmet was found intact with the strap secured and the retaining bolts in place.

In another case a racing motorcyclist came off his machine and his helmet came off his head as he crashed. Fortunately on this occasion the rider was uninjured, but later examination revealed that the helmet in question was new, a good fit and its strap had been securely fastened with the retaining bolts in place and secure.

The case of Kevin Finnis went to trial, and the court accepted that in the case of Mr Finnis, he was -

Wearing a well fitting crash helmet that was in good condition prior to the collision with the defendants vehicle.

The crash helmet was correctly fastened and secured to his head.

The crash helmet came off as a direct result of the collision with the defendants vehicle.

And as a result of the collision, Mr Finnis sustained serious head injuries.

It was also accepted that there was sufficient evidence to suggest that a crash helmet becoming detached from a riders head as a result of a collision was not that unusual occurrence.

The investigation took several months.

The final result of this case was a win for Kevin Finnis to the value of £1,487,562,22 which included £95,000 for general damages and £5,000 for congenial employment. The rest of the damages was made up of loss of earnings and care.

To date, apparently this is the most reported and referred to motorcycle case in legal history, and I am very proud and pleased to have been able to contribute to helping Mr Finnis in this case.

The bottom line is that in some cases if the impact is hard enough, then the head can shrink sufficiently in a split second to allow the helmet to rotate and come off the riders head.

There have been several similar cases since.

So sorry to ramble on, but I hope that I have answered the question adequately even though it was intended for @kwacky
It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world than 30 years early in the next
User avatar
T.C.
Posts: 406
Joined: 08 Jan 2016, 12:08
Your Bike: Blackbird
Location: Reading, Berks
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 250 times
Contact:

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by T.C. »

bud wrote:
Kwacky wrote:It is possible for a correctly fitted helmet to come off
I remember that horrible crash that killed Marco Simoncelli. No fault was ever found with the helmet, even though it came off.
Read my piece below.

That is why no fault was found

I should have added that compulsory wearing of motorcycle clothing will not be ntroduced because it is far too subjective and one persons idea of protective clothing is not anothers, and there are too many variables. (I think we have already had this discussion in another thread)

It is down to education.
It is better to arrive 30 seconds late in this world than 30 years early in the next
User avatar
Rossgo
Posts: 10407
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 02:01
Your Bike:
Location: Berkshire
Has thanked: 5280 times
Been thanked: 1326 times

Re: Question for Kwacky

Post by Rossgo »

Wow I didn't realise that helmets can fall off! I wouldnt wish that on anyone

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Post Reply