Bike Failed MOT

The news and your views about biking
Post Reply
Tuffers
Posts: 414
Joined: 08 Jun 2014, 12:35
Your Bike: Ducati Scrambler & Aprilia Tuono V4 Factory
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Bike Failed MOT

Post by Tuffers »

Because it has an integrated tail light. Apparently became law since my last MOT. So, I've had to SORN the bike and source a red tail light and new rear indicators. Tax was up today too. I'm in a bad mood today.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38580
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4324 times
Been thanked: 8362 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by Kwacky »

Ouch.

I thought the rule about rear indicator spacing has been in place for some time? I know it's been discussed before on other forums.
DaytonAndy
Posts: 1387
Joined: 07 Apr 2014, 16:38
Your Bike: Daytona 675R
Has thanked: 271 times
Been thanked: 388 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by DaytonAndy »

Could you not have left the tail light as it was and disconnected the indicating part of it? My mate just failed his mot for not having the pillion pegs attached.
Tuffers
Posts: 414
Joined: 08 Jun 2014, 12:35
Your Bike: Ducati Scrambler & Aprilia Tuono V4 Factory
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by Tuffers »

DaytonAndy wrote:Could you not have left the tail light as it was and disconnected the indicating part of it? My mate just failed his mot for not having the pillion pegs attached.
I could've disconnected the indicating part if I'd known beforehand that it would fail. The thing is I was unaware that it was illegal. Last years MOT was fine, I rang the last place I got it MOT'd at and they said the new rule has come in since my last test. How the feck was I to know it is now illegal :@

On a side note mine has no pillion pegs on it and that wasn't flagged.
User avatar
Monty
Posts: 6706
Joined: 12 Mar 2014, 07:59
Your Bike: KTM 690 SMC R
Location: Peak District
Has thanked: 2115 times
Been thanked: 2439 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by Monty »

Tuffers wrote:
DaytonAndy wrote:Could you not have left the tail light as it was and disconnected the indicating part of it? My mate just failed his mot for not having the pillion pegs attached.
I could've disconnected the indicating part if I'd known beforehand that it would fail. The thing is I was unaware that it was illegal. Last years MOT was fine, I rang the last place I got it MOT'd at and they said the new rule has come in since my last test. How the feck was I to know it is now illegal :@

On a side note mine has no pillion pegs on it and that wasn't flagged.
My MOT guy pulled me for integrated indicators three years ago. To be fair to him he handed me two bulbs, some wire, gaffer tape and suggested I go out side and wire something up. Top bloke!

The pillion pegs have to be fitted if you have a rear seat fitted. If you fit a seal cowl you don't need them for the MOT, as I found out this year!
Monty™© MCMLXXII
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38580
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4324 times
Been thanked: 8362 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by Kwacky »

I didn't know that about the pillion pegs.
Hondaboy63
Posts: 47
Joined: 18 Feb 2017, 14:57
Your Bike: S1000rr x 2.
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by Hondaboy63 »

Ive had integrated rear light for 4 years. I have not been failed a mot, with my current garage, when the law came out several years ago, my normal garaged failed me. I then took it to another garage. Its is based on braking and indicating, and the visibility of the indicator. I classed it on the view point i indicate before i brake, giving the vehicle behind pre emptive notification of my intentions to turn.
****, I've been behind cars that don't indicate.
Highway code informs you that you need to keep a safe distance from the vehicle in front.
Whats the problem here?????.
User avatar
Kwacky
Posts: 38580
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:52
Your Bike: Brutale 800RR, 1000SX Ninja
Location: Brum
Has thanked: 4324 times
Been thanked: 8362 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by Kwacky »

I'm pretty certain there is supposed to be a minimum distance between the indicators
User avatar
D6Nutz
Posts: 7431
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 21:26
Your Bike: Speed Triple 1200 RS
Has thanked: 828 times
Been thanked: 2606 times
Contact:

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by D6Nutz »

Kwacky wrote:I'm pretty certain there is supposed to be a minimum distance between the indicators
I used to have integrated indicators on the D6 all those years ago, and they failed me because of this.

I got some car side repeaters, I think they where from a mondeo, and mounted them on the undertray. That was enough to pass the mot.
You never really learn to swear until you learn to drive.

If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough - Mario Andretti
User avatar
StMarks
Posts: 4585
Joined: 17 Mar 2014, 21:55
Your Bike: Daytona 675 graphite
Location: East Riding of Yorkshire
Has thanked: 918 times
Been thanked: 1314 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by StMarks »

They do indeed now need to be a minimum distance apart.
Fwiw although I have an integrated rear, I have disconnected the indicating connections and installed some mini indicators instead.:
This was not actually down to the legal requirement.:
I followed a mate riding my bike once, and realised that the integrated indicators were so close together that it would not be immediately apparent to a vehicle behind. Primarily I don't want to give any errant driver even the suggestion on an excuse for not knowing my indicated intentions that I display to them.

Besides mini indicators can actually look quite ok IMHO.

Image
User avatar
Rossgo
Posts: 10407
Joined: 14 Mar 2014, 02:01
Your Bike:
Location: Berkshire
Has thanked: 5280 times
Been thanked: 1326 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by Rossgo »

Yep I was told by a garage they were illegal to. I quickly changed them back to the correct ones then had my bike nicked!! Pointless activity!!

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
User avatar
duke63
Posts: 15500
Joined: 22 Oct 2013, 07:34
Your Bike: Ducati 748/853 & Triumph Street Triple 765RS
Location: Staffordshire
Has thanked: 4177 times
Been thanked: 4132 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by duke63 »

I followed a 2015 Fireblade with integrated indicators the other day.

Frankly in terms of what they are supposed to do which is show other road users that you were turning or pulling out, they were absolute shite. Personally i would class them as a danger to your own safety.
User avatar
StMarks
Posts: 4585
Joined: 17 Mar 2014, 21:55
Your Bike: Daytona 675 graphite
Location: East Riding of Yorkshire
Has thanked: 918 times
Been thanked: 1314 times

Re: Bike Failed MOT

Post by StMarks »

duke63 wrote:I followed a 2015 Fireblade with integrated indicators the other day.

Frankly in terms of what they are supposed to do which is show other road users that you were turning or pulling out, they were absolute shite. Personally i would class them as a danger to your own safety.
(nod) Precisely my point mate.
Post Reply