The Daily Post Election Politics Thread

[StMarks]

Signed it ......

Fwiw, whilst I am entirely in agreement with the case (almost all public servants & the majority of private sector employees must pay for their own meals) I would only have signed if it had been a uGov Poll that may actually mean something.

[Monty]

Signed it ......

Fwiw, whilst I am entirely in agreement with the case (almost all public servants & the majority of private sector employees must pay for their own meals) I would only have signed if it had been a uGov Poll that may actually mean something.

Really? Do you know who owns uGov?

[D41]

You could always just tell us and end the suspense, M.......??

[duke63]

https://www.ladbible.com/news/uk-marcus ... nWU9HZ1zW8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Good job someone is giving these kids a hand...because the Government sure aren't.

[D6Nutz]

But you have to love a true British reaction.

https://www.itv.com/news/2020-10-23/ris ... hool-meals" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

[duke63]

Waiting for the next u turn.

Johnson and Co have **** up big time this time. Its not the kids fault they don't get fed, regardless of the reason it does happen.

The Tory MP who claimed meal vouchers ended up in brothels and crack dens, also claimed £203,000 in expenses last year.

[duke63]

How many dinners would this fund? There are going to be a lot of Tory MPs who find their constituents will not forget how they voted in this one.

[Monty]

Fingers crossed.

Echos of the milk snatcher!

[duke63]

[Monty]

[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3Rzyql ... _Ybivj14OY[/video]

[D41]

Great rant. He reminds me of George Carlin.
Thanks for posting that.

[Monty]

[duke63]

[Monty]

HAHA **** brilliant!!!

[duke63]

[Jack]

on a more serious note -
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=amDv2gk ... WL&index=5[/video]

[Kwacky]

Got a quick summary Jack?

[Jack]

Got a quick summary Jack?

the government restrictions are unconstitutional , immoral and probably illegal , he stops just short of saying illegal , he breaks down the acts they have used and why they have used them . It's very interesting and I'm not a legal professional .

[Kwacky]

Cheers. I'll take a look over the weekend.

There's been a lot of discussion about this on twitter. Patel's talk of "liberal lawyers" is aimed at immigration lawyers publicly, but the legal profession knows it's a wider target than that. A lot of constitutional and human rights have been vocal about the changes this government has made under the cloak of covid. I've posted about it a couple of times.

The government have for a few years been positioning themselves to be above legal scrutiny. That's a dangerous step.

[D41]

The government have for a few years been positioning themselves to be above legal scrutiny.

Is that the result of every single thing they do being dissected under a microscope these days, or another ulterior motive...??